Shareholder not considered farmer under MYEL law as company business was not his own farming activity.

The Insurance Court dismissed the appeal against the Pensions Board's decision not to classify a 60% shareholder as a farmer under the Farmers' Pensions Act. Although the company engaged in agricultural activities, the court found the shareholder did not personally participate in the farming work required by the law. Consequently, the shareholder was not eligible for pension coverage under the specific provisions of the Farmers' Pensions Act.