Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 19.3.1998/6996:95 AI generated

Court ruled that intermittent part-time work breaks regular service continuity for pension eligibility.

Case Number VakO 19.3.1998/6996:95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court modified the State Pension Board's decision regarding a teacher's pension eligibility. The teacher held a full-time position until July 1987, followed by intermittent part-time work that did not meet regular service duration requirements. The court determined that the technical break in service was permanent due to the nature of the intermittent employment, thereby ending the continuous service period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vakuutusoikeuslaki 1993:1001, 10 luku; 10.10.1001:1001, 10 luku, 10.10.1001:1001, 10 luku, 10.10.1001:1001, 10 luku: When a teacher's employment shifts from full-time to intermittent part-time work, the technical break in service is considered permanent, terminating the continuous service period required for pension eligibility.

Keywords

AI generated
intermittent employment service continuity pension eligibility full-time to part-time technical break in service
AI generated
insurance_1990_410-1990
Part-time teacher denied unemployment benefits for period after contract ended due to lack of layoff.
admin_1999_turku-and-pori-county__449
Administrative court denies severance pay for temporary teacher due to valid future need uncertainty.
insurance_2006_6967-2005
Unfinished studies due to missing exam disqualify unemployed benefit claimant as active student.
insurance_2013_2585-2011
Technical break rule incontinues for less than three years when full-time worker switches to part-time with same employer.
insurance_2022_21382-2021
Court denies private pension claim when current employment continues without essential change after state pension start.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Henkilö, joka oli toiminut oppilaitoksen päätoimisena tuntiopettajana 1.9.1972 alkaen, oli irtisanoutunut kyseisestä toimesta 30.7.1987. Hän oli sittemmin toiminut oppilaitoksen sivutoimisena tuntiopettajana syyslukukaudella 1987, kevätlukukaudella 1988, syyskuun 1988 sekä syyslukukauden 1989. Henkilön työaika ei enää 1.9.1987 jälkeen vastannut päätoimisen tuntiopettajan säännöllisenä pidettävää työaikaa ja hänen työansionsa olivat samalla alentuneet vähintään neljänneksellä. Koska työajan muutosta ei voitu katsoa tarkoitetun tilapäiseksi olivat teknisen katkaisun edellytykset olemassa. Henkilön palvelua oppilaitoksessa pidettiin 1.9.1987 lukien eri palveluksena. Valtion eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin.

Jaosto:II Äänestys: