Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 22.10.1998/4825:97 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal regarding pension age calculation for a kindergarten director based on established title interpretation.

Case Number VakO 22.10.1998/4825:97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the municipal pension board's decision regarding her pension eligibility age. Although the applicant held the title of 'director' from 1973, the board applied a 63-year pension age because the official title 'responsible nurse' was not listed in the lower pension category of the municipal pension regulations. The court upheld the board's decision, ruling that the established interpretation of the pension rules requires using the pension age associated with the official job title regardless of the specific duties performed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Municipal Pension Act; Municipal Pension Regulations: The pension age applicable to a civil servant is determined by the official job title listed in the pension regulations, not by the actual duties performed, and established interpretations of these titles must be followed.

Keywords

AI generated
pension age calculation municipal pension regulations official job title pension eligibility criteria administrative appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Municipal Pension Act
Municipal Pension Regulations
AI generated
insurance_1983_948-1983
Insurance court dismissed pension annulment request due to lack of compelling reasons for correcting erroneous income data.
insurance_2003_8346-2001
Insurance court lacks jurisdiction to annul pension decisions under the 1999 Transfer Act due to absence of explicit statutory authority.
insurance_1973_3854-1972
Insurance court dismissed claim for separate employment contracts due to continuous factory dismantling work.
insurance_2003_10247-2001
Insurance court denied pension office liability for lawyer fees in retroactive legal aid proceedings where the office was not a party.
insurance_2020_3756-2019
Insurance court allows pension recalculation when retrospective payments exceed five times monthly pension.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

X oli 19.6.1973 valittu päiväkodin seimen johtajattaren virkaan 1.8.1973 lukien. Viran nimikkeenä oli vuodesta 1974 lähtien ollut vastaava hoitaja. Virkatai ammattinimitystä "vastaava hoitaja" ei ole mainittu kunnallisen eläkelaitoksen eläkesäännön liitteessä alempaan eläkeikään oikeuttavien virkatai ammattinimitysten joukossa. X:ään ei ole sovellettu lastenhoitajan 58 vuoden eläkeikää vaan eläkeiäksi tässä palvelussuhteessa on katsottu 63 vuotta, koska eläkesäännön eläkeikäjärjestelmän vakiintuneen tulkinnan mukaan viranhaltijan eläkeikänä pidetään viran eläkeikää riippumatta viranhaltijan yksityiskohtaisista työtehtävistä. Kuntien eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: 4-1