Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 25.6.1997/6859:96 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for unpaid YEL premiums deducted from net pension under Finnish Insurance Act.

Case Number VakO 25.6.1997/6859:96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim regarding the deduction of unpaid YEL premiums from their net pension. The pension authority had deducted one-third of the net pension amount based on the Entrepreneurs' Pension Act, arguing that reimbursement claims take precedence over wage garnishment protections. The court upheld this decision, ruling that the specific statutory provisions for pension deductions override general wage garnishment safeguards in this context.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Finnish Insurance Act s. 10; Finnish Entrepreneurs' Pension Act s. 12: When calculating net pensions for premium deductions, specific pension law provisions regarding reimbursement claims prevail over general wage garnishment protection rules.

Keywords

AI generated
YEL premiums net pension deduction entrepreneurs pension act wage garnishment pension authority insurance court premium recovery

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Finnish Insurance Act s. 10
Finnish Entrepreneurs' Pension Act s. 12
AI generated
insurance_1980_8402-1979
Insurance court held that the year of decision by the pension fund counts as the year of lapse for YEL insurance obligations.
admin_2003_rovaniemi__145
Court allows deduction of unpaid pension insurance premiums from pension when business partnership ceased paying.
insurance_1994_5419-1993
Insurance court allowed pension fund to recover overpaid unemployment benefits from another pension fund.
insurance_1976_7310-1975
Insurance court allowed insurer to change quarterly premium payments to annual based on policy terms.
insurance_2003_4554-2002
Family pension based on deceased worker's voluntary supplementary benefits is excluded from calculation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

X:lle oli myönnetty työkyvyttömyyseläke 1.12.1995 alkaen 31.10.1996 saakka. Eläkkeen määrä oli 5.171,57 markkaa kuukaudessa, josta YEL-eläkkeen osuus oli 4.891,43 markkaa kuukaudessa. Eläkelaitos oli yrittäjien eläkeasetuksen 12 §:n 1 momentin nojalla perinyt maksamattomia YEL-vakuutusmaksuja X:n joulukuun 1995 yrittäjien eläkelain mukaisesta nettoeläkkeen määrästä kolmanneksen. Eläkelautakunta oli todennut, että vakuutusmaksuja vastaisista eläkkeistä kuitattaessa ei noudateta asetusta suojaosuudesta palkan ulosmittauksessa, koska yrittäjien eläkelaissa säädetyt kuittausvaateet ovat ensisijaisia ulosottoon nähden. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu.

Jaosto:VII Äänestys: