Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 29.9.1997/6533:97 AI generated

Social security court dismissed housing allowance appeal; income increase justified new review under housing allowance law.

Case Number VakO 29.9.1997/6533:97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Social Security Court dismissed the applicant's request to revoke the pension authority's decision regarding housing allowance. The authority had confirmed the allowance after an interim review, but later discovered the applicant's income was significantly higher than previously assessed. The court ruled that the authority could not be barred from conducting a new investigation based on this newly revealed income data.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laws 1993:1000, Section 15; Housing allowance law Section 15: The authority may conduct a new review of housing allowance eligibility based on subsequent facts discovered after a decision becomes final.

Keywords

AI generated
housing allowance income verification social security review final decision new investigation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laws 1993:1000, Section 15
Housing allowance law Section 15
AI generated
insurance_1998_6040-1997
Child qualifies for family pension after father's death despite short residence due to family relocation.
insurance_2000_3676-1999
Student housing allowance denied when general housing support applies due to prior study start date.
insurance_2012_1597-2011
Insurance Court rejects delaying annual housing allowance review when long-term unemployment benefits apply to interim review. Annual review covers all known changes regardless of interim review delays.
admin_1995_mikkeli-county__858
Spousal housing allowance correctly excluded from patient fee calculation under social services fee act.
insurance_1998_3859-1997
Social security residency determined by actual residence date, not marriage or intent, per Finnish law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kansaneläkelaitos oli 17.6.1996 antamallaan päätöksellä myöntänyt K:lle asumistuen. 24.10.1996 annetulla päätöksellä oli todettu ettei asumistuen välitarkistuksella ollut aihetta ja maksatus jatkui 17.6.1996 annetun päätöksen mukaisesti. Sittemmin vuositarkistushakemuksen yhteydessä oli käynyt ilmi, että K:n tulot olivat olennaisesti aiemmin huomioon otettua suuremmat.

Kansaneläkelaitoksen 24.10.1996 antaman päätöksen poistamista koskeva hakemus hylättiin. Kansaneläkelaitos voi mainitun lainvoimaisen päätöksen estämättä uuden selvityksen perusteella tutkia asian uudelleen asumistukilain 15 §:ssä säädettynä asumistuen tarkitusasiana.

Samoin VakO 6892:97

Jaosto

IV