Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 28.8.1997/6217:96 AI generated

Child support assets counted in asset base but not income for housing allowance calculation.

Case Number VakO 28.8.1997/6217:96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court overturned the Social Security Board's decision regarding the calculation of housing allowance for the applicant. The Board had excluded assets received as child support from the applicant's taxable wealth but included them in their income. The court ruled that while these assets must be counted in the asset base, they should not be treated as income for the purpose of the allowance calculation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vakuutusoikeus 10.1.1997/100:1996; Vakuutusoikeus 10.1.1997/100:1996: Assets received as child support are included in the asset base for housing allowance but excluded from income calculation.

Keywords

AI generated
housing allowance child support asset base income calculation social security taxable wealth financial resources

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Vakuutusoikeus 10.1.1997/100:1996
AI generated
kko-precedent_2008_109
Supreme Court allows partial restitution of child support when paternity is voided and recipient knew non-paternity.
admin_1987_kuopio-county__28
County court orders municipality to pay foster care costs when mother's home town is deemed child's home town.
admin_1988_uusimaa-county__114
Court held that a child support payment based on a later finding of non-paternity was not erroneous under the Act on Child Support.
kko-precedent_1995_121
Supreme Court allows child support increase where initial award lacked factual basis and was unreasonable.
appeal_1980_vaasa__460
Court allows child support despite voluntary evasion by parent due to special heavy reasons.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

X:n osituksen yhteydessä tasinkona saama omaisuus, joka oli kuitattu maksetusta lasten vastaisena elatusapuna, voitiin lukea asumistuen määrää laskettaessa X:n verotettavaan varallisuuteen, mutta ei hänen tuloihinsa. Tarkastuslautakunnan päätös kumottiin.

Jaosto

VI