Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 20.8.1997/6054:96 AI generated

Court dismissed claim for partial unemployment benefits as interview work did not qualify as part-time employment under insurance laws.

Case Number VakO 20.8.1997/6054:96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's request for adjusted unemployment benefits, ruling that their interview work did not constitute part-time employment under the relevant statutes. The applicant argued for regular hours and a fixed salary, but the court found their work varied monthly with hourly pay and no defined full-time schedule. Consequently, the court held that the applicant's irregular engagement failed to meet the legal definition of part-time work required for benefit adjustment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Insurance Act; Part-time Employment Act: Work characterized by irregular monthly hours and hourly pay without a defined full-time schedule does not qualify as part-time employment for the purpose of adjusted unemployment benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment insurance benefits part-time employment definition irregular working hours hourly wage basis benefit adjustment eligibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Insurance Act
Part-time Employment Act
AI generated
labour_1989_136
Labour court dismisses union claim that employee with under-seven-hour workday is entitled to lunch break and meal voucher under collective agreement.
insurance_1989_623-1989
Court ruled unemployment benefits payable when full-time status changes to part-time under same employer.
kho-precedent_1998_50
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding wage security procedure violations and employer liability for unpaid wages.
insurance_2000_934-1999
Court denies unemployment benefits to spouse of business owner due to substantial business activity and risk assumption.
insurance_2000_8684-1999
Unemployment benefit granted when 60% variable work schedule without overtime pay does not exceed 75% cap.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Haastattelijan työtä ei katsottu työttömyysturvalaissa tarkoitetuksi osa-aikatyöksi eikä oikeutta soviteltuun työttömyyspäivärahaan siten ollut. Haastattelijalla ei työsopimuksen mukaan ollut säännöllistä työaikaa, työmäärä vaihteli kuukausittain ja palkkauksen perusteena oli tuntipalkka. Kenellekään työnantajan palveluksessa olevalle haastattelijalle ei ollut määritelty kokoaikaisen työntekijän työaikaa. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. VIII-jaosto Kts. VakO 3687:95 II-jaosto Kiinteistönvälittäjä Myyntiedustaja VakO 3153:97 II-jaosto Kiinteistönvälittäjä Myyntiedustaja