Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 25.9.1997/10575:96 AI generated

Student's late income declaration prevented retroactive recovery of already paid study grant.

Case Number VakO 25.9.1997/10575:96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court allowed the full recovery of 8,478 marks of study grant paid to a student who declared excess income only after receiving a clarification request. The court determined that because the funds were already disbursed, the period in question could not be retroactively excluded from the grant eligibility. Consequently, the study grant appeal board's decision to recover the entire overpayment was upheld without modification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Opintolain 1992/1993 10 luku 10 a luku; If the recipient declares excess income only after the grant has been paid, the payment period cannot be retroactively excluded, and the full amount must be recovered.

Keywords

AI generated
study grant excess income retroactive recovery late declaration payment period

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Opintolain 1992/1993 10 luku 10 a luku
AI generated
insurance_2006_216-2006
Insurance court allowed late appeal due to university board's failure to forward it within statutory time limits.
insurance_2009_5511-2008
Study support continued granted when average credits per support month met minimum threshold despite partial housing allowance receipt.
insurance_2002_3845-2002
Finnish Insurance Court allows student to keep overpaid scholarship by excluding pre-enrollment capital gains from income calculation.
insurance_2002_5209-2001
Finnish Insurance Court dismissed appeal against student loan recovery, ruling no constitutional equality violation exists.
kho-precedent_1997_68
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed recovery of student loan funds as income under social assistance law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Opiskelija ilmoitti tulojensa ylityksestä vasta saatuaan opintotukilautakunnan selvityspyynnön, minkä vuoksi hänelle ehdittiin maksaa aiheettomasti opintorahaa yhteensä 8.478 markkaa. Kun opintoraha oli jo ehditty maksaa opiskelijalle, kyseinen aika katsottiin tukikuukausiksi jota koskevaa hakemusta ei voinut takautuvasti peruuttaa. Aiheettomasti maksettu tuki perittiin kokonaisuudessaan takaisin. Opintotuen muutoksenhakulautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. I-jaosto