Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 9.5.1996/1998:95 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed employer's appeal against unemployment fund's decision to reinstate member status after voluntary exit.

Case Number VakO 9.5.1996/1998:95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the employer's appeal against the Unemployment Fund's decision to reinstate member A's status retroactively. The Fund argued that A should not have been expelled for voluntarily leaving the profession when becoming a business owner, despite the original expulsion ruling. The court agreed, holding that the voluntary change of profession did not justify the retroactive termination of membership.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Insurance Act; Insurance Court Act: The court may reinstate a member's status if the original expulsion was based on a voluntary change of profession that does not constitute a valid ground for termination.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment insurance member status voluntary profession change retroactive expulsion insurance court appeal fund membership employer appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Insurance Act
Insurance Court Act
AI generated
insurance_1998_5639-1997
Unemployment insurance court denied membership because applicant was not employed in the insurance company's specific field of business.
insurance_2000_7340-1998
Fraudulent concealment of employment allows retroactive termination of unemployment insurance membership after hearing.
insurance_2004_4170-2003
Court dismissed appeal; applicant deemed member of second fund last joined, preserving prior employment period.
insurance_2022_21318-2021
Insurance court quashes lower court decision due to lack of appealable ruling on student status termination.
insurance_2005_8284-2002
Insurance court dismissed late appeal by unemployment fund against unemployment board decision due to procedural delay.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A. oli työttömyyskassan 19.5.1994 antamalla päätöksellä erotettu kassan jäsenyydestä 26.10.1991 lukien, koska hän oli ryhtyessään yrittäjäksi siirtynyt pois työttömyyskassan ammattialalta. Katsottiin, että A:ta ei olisi tällä perusteella tullut erottaa takautuvasti työttömyyskassan jäsenyydestä. Työttömyystur

valautakunnan päätös kumottiin. (Äänestys 4-1) VI-jaosto