Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 23.10.1995/3283:95 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed pension supplement revocation request due to excessive delay and lack of serious reasons.

Case Number VakO 23.10.1995/3283:95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court rejected the Social Insurance Institution's request to revoke a 1985 pension supplement decision. The Institution argued that a 1985 state family pension was overlooked, causing an overpayment of 70,117 marks, while the applicant had previously requested a family pension. The court dismissed the request because the application was filed over five years after the decision became final and lacked serious grounds for revocation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act s. 10; Social Insurance Act s. 10: A request to revoke a final administrative decision is inadmissible if filed after a significant delay without serious reasons.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative delay pension supplement revocation request final decision serious reasons insurance court overpayment recovery

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act s. 10
Social Insurance Act s. 10
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2018:143
Appeal of administrative court's legal aid decision dismissed due to statutory appeal ban in child support cases.
insurance_2002_4213-2001
Insurance court allows appeal against review board decision on social benefit waiver due to agency authority.
insurance_2007_9294-2005
Insurance Court dismissed appeal; pension law's recovery rule excludes statute of limitations for pension agency claims.
insurance_1983_248-1982
Insurance court dismissed pension revocation claim where prior pension calculation included another person's insurance contributions.
insurance_1985_5202-1984
Insurance court dismissed claim for full repayment of erroneously paid pension, ordering only half restitution based on recipient's circumstances.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kansaneläkelaitos oli 6.4.1995 hakenut vakuutusoikeudelta 9.5.1985 antamansa A:n kansaneläkkeen lisäosan tarkistuspäätöksen poistamista, koska päätöstä annettaessa ei lisäosavuositulona ollut otettu huomioon valtiokonttorin 10.4.1985 A:lle 1.3.1985 alkaen myöntämää julkisoikeudellista perhe-eläkettä. Virheen seurauksena lisäosa oli myönnetty liian suurena ja A:lle oli 1.3.1985 lukien maksettu liikaa lisäosaa yhteensä 70.117 markkaa. Hakiessaan 20.2.1985 lisäosan tarkistusta A oli ilmoittanut hakevansa perhe-eläkettä muun muassa valtiokonttorilta. VakO hylkäsi hakemuksen, koska se oli tehty yli viiden vuoden kuluttua tarkistuspäätöksen lainvoimaiseksi tulosta eikä päätöksen poistamiseksi ollut erittäin painavia syitä. (Äänestys 15-4) Täysistunto