Insurance court dismissed claim where applicant's inconsistent interview data failed to prove self-caused contract failure.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's claim against the Unemployment Security Board. The applicant provided contradictory information by telephone regarding the content of a job interview, which the court deemed insufficient evidence to prove the applicant caused the contract's non-conclusion through their own conduct. Consequently, the court reversed the Unemployment Security Board's decision, ruling that the applicant's procedural errors did not justify the denial of benefits.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUnemployment Security Act; Insurance Court Act: When an applicant provides inconsistent information regarding a job interview, the burden of proof for self-caused contract failure remains on the applicant, and contradictory testimony alone is insufficient to justify denying unemployment benefits.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Työhönottajan ja työnhakijan antamat tiedot puhelimitse käydyn työhönottohaastattelun sisällöstä olivat ristiriitaisia. Katsottiin jääneen näyttämättä, että työnhakija olisi omalla menettelyllään aiheuttanut työsopimuksen syntymättä jäämisen. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. (Äänestys 3-2) III-jaosto