VakO 11.10.1990/5376:89
AI generated
Insurance court dismissed claim where independent contractor status was found instead of employment relationship.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim for pension benefits based on an employment relationship. The court determined that the applicant worked as an independent contractor rather than being in an employment relationship. Consequently, the decision of the Pension Board was not altered.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInsurance Act; Social Insurance Act: The court established that benefits contingent on an employment relationship are denied when the individual is legally classified as an independent contractor.
Keywords
AI generated
independent contractor status
employment relationship
pension benefits
insurance court decision
social insurance law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedInsurance Act
Social Insurance Act
Related Decisions
AI generatedlabour_2006_55
Labor court dismisses employer's appeal, ordering severance pay for unfair dismissal without prior warning.
insurance_1987_3242-1986
Insurance court dismissed claim where employee validly refused job due to pending contract with another employer.
admin_2001_turku__105
Court ruled consultant fees are work compensation under Act 25, not wages under Act 13.
labour_2016_123
Labour Court dismisses union appeal; deputy union rep lost special dismissal protection after becoming head rep post-notice.
insurance_1980_11164-1978
Court dismissed claim for employment status as researcher was independent contractor under contract terms.
Full text
Kotiompelijan katsottiin työskennelleen itsenäisenä yrittäjänä eikä työsuhteessa. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. V-jaosto Samoin VAKO 5377:89, 5378:89 ja 5379:89