Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 16.8.1990/410:90 AI generated

Part-time teacher denied unemployment benefits for period after contract ended due to lack of layoff.

Case Number VakO 16.8.1990/410:90
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Unemployment Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim for adjusted unemployment benefits covering the period from April 24 to May 15, 1989. The applicant, a part-time lecturer whose main contract had ended, had accepted additional part-time work during this time without being officially laid off under the Unemployment Insurance Act. The court ruled that without a formal layoff, the applicant had no right to benefits for these specific days.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Insurance Act 1980, s. 17; The right to adjusted unemployment benefits is contingent upon a formal layoff; accepting additional work without a layoff excludes entitlement to benefits for that period.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment insurance part-time employment layoff requirement benefit eligibility contract termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Insurance Act 1980, s. 17
AI generated
insurance_2000_8684-1999
Unemployment benefit granted when 60% variable work schedule without overtime pay does not exceed 75% cap.
insurance_2007_3620-2004
Court dismisses unemployment claim where contract defines seasonal breaks as non-termination rather than leave.
insurance_1998_6996-1995
Court ruled that intermittent part-time work breaks regular service continuity for pension eligibility.
insurance_1987_2213-1986
Student barista denied unemployment benefits as full-time student during summer break.
insurance_1987_3242-1986
Insurance court dismissed claim where employee validly refused job due to pending contract with another employer.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kansalaisopiston päätoimisen tuntiopettajan työsuhde oli päättynyt. Opiston työkausi oli päättynyt 23.4.1989. 24.4.-15.5.1989 hän oli ottanut vielä vastaan 13 tuntia kestäneen osa-aikatyön. Kun hakijaa ei ollut mainittujen päivien väliseksi ajaksi työttömyysturvalain 17 §:n mukaisesti lomautettu, hänellä ei ollut tältä ajalta oikeutta soviteltuun työttömyyspäivärahaan. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. (Äänestys 3-2) VI-jaosto