Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 11.10.1990/3998:90 AI generated

Court dismissed claim that refusing work requiring own clothes violated cultural heritage and unemployment insurance laws.

Case Number VakO 11.10.1990/3998:90
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Unemployment Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim that refusing employment requiring personal attire violated cultural heritage provisions and unemployment insurance statutes. The applicant argued this restriction conflicted with the Unemployment Act and Unemployment Insurance Act, but the court found no valid reason for the refusal. Consequently, the decision upholding the refusal of the work was not altered.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Act s. 16(3); Unemployment Insurance Act s. 7(1): A refusal of employment based on cultural heritage considerations does not constitute a valid reason for rejection if the work is deemed suitable, and such a refusal does not violate the statutory framework.

Keywords

AI generated
cultural heritage protection unemployment insurance law employment refusal personal attire requirement suitable work assessment statutory conflict labor court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Act s. 16(3)
Unemployment Insurance Act s. 7(1)
AI generated
admin_1988_uusimaa-county__476
Administrative court dismissed discrimination claim as applicant failed to prove equal merit considering all job requirements.
labour_1985_46
Firefighters' strike over overtime rules deemed illegal strike action violating collective agreement peace clauses.
insurance_2000_4286-1999
Conscientious objection to military storage work validly exempts claimant from unemployment benefit denial.
labour_2019_5
Labor court dismissed union claim that employer violated redundancy rules by firing less critical employee first.
labour_1982_112a
Labor court dismisses union strike actions for holiday disputes and orders fines for violating work peace obligations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Romaaninainen oli kieltäytynyt työstä, jossa työskennellessään hän olisi joutunut käyttämään muita kuin omia vaatteitaan. Työvoimatoimikunta oli asiassa todennut, että kulttuuriperinne on työllisyyslain 16 §:n 3 momentin ja työttömyysturvalain 7 §:n 1 momentin kanssa ristiriidassa. Romaanihenkilön katsottiin kieltäytyneen ilman pätevää syytä sopivaksi katsottavasta työstä. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. V-jaosto