Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 29.3.1990/3576:89 AI generated

Insurance court ruled short-term transport workers must use TEL pension scheme, not LEL, per specific Act provision.

Case Number VakO 29.3.1990/3576:89
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Vakuutusoikeus upheld the pension board's decision against a transport worker claiming eligibility for the LEL scheme. The court found that workers transporting sawdust and chaff to industrial facilities and returning with other cargo were subject to the TEL Act under Section 1 of the relevant regulation. Consequently, the claim to switch pension schemes was rejected as the statutory classification for these specific duties mandated the TEL system.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 1 of the Act on the application of the short-term employment pension scheme; workers transporting sawdust and chaff to industrial facilities and returning with other cargo are subject to the TEL pension scheme, not the LEL scheme.

Keywords

AI generated
short-term employment pension scheme classification transport duties TEL Act industrial cargo pension eligibility Vakuutusoikeus

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 1 of the Act on the application of the short-term employment pension scheme
AI generated
insurance_1991_6081-1990
Insurance court ruled a puppet theater visitor agreement constituted an indefinite-term employment relationship subject to TEL.
insurance_1974_2318-1973
Insurance court dismissed deduction of pension contributions due to lack of evidence for temporary work status.
kho-precedent_2003_101
Supreme Administrative Court allows transport services for disabled workers on retirement grounds violating equality principle.
insurance_1986_2943-1984
Insurance court ruled workers in sawmill peeling areas are covered by general liability, not forestry-specific insurance.
admin_1991_hame-county__1243
Court dismissed welfare benefits claim for car expenses when vehicle was not used for work travel.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kuljetusliikkeen autonkuljettajiin, jotka kuljettivat haketta ja purua sahalaitoksilta teollisuuslaitoksille ja paluumatkalla muuta lastia, oli sovellettava TEL:a eikä LEL:a lyhytaikaisissa työsuhteissa olevien työntekijäin eläkelain soveltamisesta annetun asetuksen 1 §:n perusteella. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. V-jaosto