Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 10.10.1990/1578:90 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed pension claim due to insufficient investigation of total pension security coverage.

Case Number VakO 10.10.1990/1578:90
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the widow's request to adjust her pension based on her prior service in the VEL scheme. The pension authority had granted a pension starting in 1986 but failed to properly assess her total pension security when the VEL service was ending. The court ruled that the decision was flawed because it did not adequately consider the combined effect of all pension sources on the applicant's security.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Social Security Act: When a pension decision fails to account for the total security provided by multiple pension sources, the decision is invalid and must be reconsidered with a comprehensive assessment of all benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
total pension security pension adjustment insufficient investigation multiple pension sources social security coverage

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Social Security Act
AI generated
insurance_2020_3756-2019
Insurance court allows pension recalculation when retrospective payments exceed five times monthly pension.
insurance_2008_7395-2006
Insurance Court dismisses appeal; pension calculation based on 2004 earnings per Pension Act 7 § 1 applies despite lower-level rules.
insurance_1983_2317-1982
Insurance court dismissed pension claim due to early farm control transfer before official ownership change.
insurance_2004_9669-2002
Insurance court dismissed appeal claiming combined pension was lower than single pension due to coordination.
insurance_2003_10247-2001
Insurance court denied pension office liability for lawyer fees in retroactive legal aid proceedings where the office was not a party.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eläkelaitos oli myöntänyt emännälle vanhuuseläkkeen 1.3.1986 alkaen. Emäntä oli ollut vuodesta 1972 myös VEL-palvelussuhteessa ja se oli päättymässä hänen täyttäessään 70-vuoden iän tammikuussa 1991. Huomioon ottaen vakuutetun kokonaiseläketurvan eläkelaitoksen vanhuuseläkepäätös poistettiin puutteelliseen selvitykseen perustuneena. (VEL-eläkekertymä nousi näin ollen 30,03 %:sta 40,81 %:ksi). IV-jaosto