Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 21.1.1988/341:87 AI generated

Unemployment benefit claim dismissed due to short foreign residence periods not meeting statutory requirements.

Case Number VakO 21.1.1988/341:87
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request to have unemployment benefits declared non-recoverable after a brief stay in Spain. Although the claimant had a home in Finland and was ready to return, the foreign residence periods were too short to qualify for the benefit. The court ruled that the statutory conditions for non-recovery were not met because the time spent abroad did not satisfy the necessary duration thresholds.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment benefit Act; Social Insurance Act: A brief period of residence abroad does not automatically disqualify a claimant from having unemployment benefits declared non-recoverable if the statutory duration requirements for the foreign stay are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment benefit non-recoverable benefits foreign residence period statutory duration requirements insurance court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment benefit Act
Social Insurance Act
AI generated
insurance_2008_4771-2006
Insurance court dismissed request to annul unemployment benefit decision due to lack of grounds for annulment.
insurance_2011_1491-2010
Court dismisses claim to waive recovery of disability pension paid under a final, valid decision.
insurance_1986_5847-1985
Social security board's decision to withhold pension due to means-tested support is final and binding on pension authority.
insurance_1985_274-1985
Insurance court partially allowed claim for overpaid pension due to administrative error, exempting one quarter from recovery.
insurance_1999_11273-1998
Insurance Court dismissed excessive housing allowance claim due to minor amount and lack of legal basis.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Henkilölle oli myönnetty työttömyyseläkettä 1.11.1984 alkaen. Hän oli oleskellut Espanjassa 14.2.30.4.1985 ja 13.9.1985 alkaen joulukuun alkuun 1985. Eläkelaitos oli määrännyt takaisinperittäväksi maalis-, huhti-, lokaja marraskuun eläke-erät yhteensä 25.284,52 markkaa. Henkilön ulkomaillaolo oli kummallakin kerralla kestänyt noin 2,5 kk. Hänellä oli tuolloin ollut myös Suomessa asunto, jossa tytär oli päivystänyt. Marraskuun 1984 jälkeen hänelle ei ollut tarjottu työtä, mutta hän olisi ollut heti valmis palaamaan kotimaahan, mikäli työtä olisi tarjottu. Mainittuja eläke-eriä ei ollut perittävä takaisin. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. V-jaosto