Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 2.7.1987/810:86 AI generated

Construction workers in steel structures were not considered to be working under LEL but under TEL.

Case Number VakO 2.7.1987/810:86
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court modified the Social Security Board's decision regarding workers in a steel structure company. The Board had excluded these employees from the Long-Term Employment Act (LEL) and applied the Short-Term Employment Act (TEL) instead. The court ruled that the workers did not meet the specific job criteria defined in Section 1, Paragraph 1 of the LEL.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 1, Paragraph 1 of the Long-Term Employment Act; Section 1, Paragraph 1 of the Short-Term Employment Act: Workers in industrial steel structures are not considered to be working under the Long-Term Employment Act if their tasks do not match the statutory definition, thereby requiring application of the Short-Term Employment Act.

Keywords

AI generated
Long-Term Employment Act Short-Term Employment Act steel structure workers employment classification social security eligibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 1, Paragraph 1 of the Long-Term Employment Act
Section 1, Paragraph 1 of the Short-Term Employment Act
AI generated
insurance_1985_1836-1985
Industrial pipe workers did not qualify as construction workers under LEL 1 § 1, so TEL applied instead.
insurance_1979_5019-1977
Insurance court dismissed claim that industrial pipe fitters' employees were not covered by TEL pension scheme.
insurance_1988_3641-1986
Insulation workers installing underground pipes must be classified as pipeline workers under TEL.
insurance_1985_3653-1984
Insurance court ruled TEL applies to farm workers at artificial insemination centers, not LEL, due to job nature.
insurance_1986_2943-1984
Insurance court ruled workers in sawmill peeling areas are covered by general liability, not forestry-specific insurance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Yhtiön, jonka toimialana oli teollisuuden teräsrakenteiden, säiliöiden ja putkistojen suunnittelu, konepajavalmistus ja asennustoiminta, rautarakennetyöntekijöiden sekä teollisuusja kaukolämpöputkistojen asentajien ei katsottu työskennelleen LEL:n 1 §:n 1 momentin tarkoittamassa työssä, minkä vuoksi heihin ei ollut sovellettava LEL:a vaan TEL:a. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. (Äänestys 4-1) IV-jaosto Samoin VAKO 1836:85 ja 1857:85