Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 14.5.1987/4873:86 AI generated

Insurance court upheld unemployment benefits for a welder offered a job matching his skills.

Case Number VakO 14.5.1987/4873:86
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court upheld the Unemployment Security Board's decision to deny unemployment benefits to a welder who was offered a job matching his skills. The applicant, a thin leather worker from 1976 to 1985, argued the offer was unsuitable, but the court found the welder position appropriate given his expertise. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal and confirmed the denial of benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Security Act; Employment Security Act: An unemployment benefit recipient is not entitled to benefits if a suitable job offer is made that matches their professional skills and qualifications.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment benefits suitable employment professional skills job offer insurance court employment security benefit denial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Security Act
Employment Security Act
AI generated
insurance_2000_3648-1999
Self-employed status under unemployment insurance law bars membership termination due to permanent exit from employment.
insurance_1981_10014-1980
Court ruled that irregular seasonal security work does not constitute a continuous employment relationship under the Act on Old Age Pensions.
insurance_1990_6649-1989
Unemployment benefits claim dismissed because kitchen assistant job did not match applicant's culinary skills.
insurance_1987_3242-1986
Insurance court dismissed claim where employee validly refused job due to pending contract with another employer.
insurance_2006_10193-2004
Court allows unemployment benefits by ruling that active job seeking outside the employment office is a valid reason for absence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vuosina 1976-1985 ohutlevyseppänä työskennelleelle henkilölle tarjottua hitsaajan työtä on hänen ammattitaitonsa huomioon ottaen pidetty hänelle sopivana. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. (Äänestys 3-2) V-jaosto