Court held that a neighbor's payment for roof work created a work relationship under the Work Accident Insurance Act.

The Insurance Court reversed the Work Accident Board's decision to deny compensation for injuries sustained while working on a neighbor's roof. The plaintiff argued that the work was performed under the neighbor's supervision and for a fixed fee, constituting a work relationship under the Work Accident Insurance Act. The court agreed, finding that the payment of four jars of honey or money in exchange for the labor established the necessary subordination and control required for a work relationship.