Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 22.1.1987/1876:86 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim that an engineer's part-time work violated full-time employment rights.

Case Number VakO 22.1.1987/1876:86
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim that his part-time electrical engineering work violated his right to full-time employment. The engineer, who had lost his main job in February 1985, continued consulting and installation work alongside his primary role until July 1984. The court found his workload insufficient to constitute a barrier to accepting full-time work, rejecting the argument that his secondary activities were excessive.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vakuutusoikeus 1987:1876; The court held that an individual's part-time professional activities do not constitute a barrier to accepting full-time employment if the workload is not substantial enough to prevent such transition.

Keywords

AI generated
full-time employment rights part-time work restriction insurance court jurisdiction employment barrier assessment secondary professional activities
AI generated
insurance_2000_3648-1999
Self-employed status under unemployment insurance law bars membership termination due to permanent exit from employment.
insurance_2000_7754-1999
Self-employed status in fluctuating hours bars unemployment insurance membership termination under Finnish law.
insurance_1983_3545-1982
Court dismissed claim that a 60-year-old worker with knee arthritis was not in strenuous work due to multi-level factory floors.
insurance_1984_1028-1984
Finnish Insurance Court dismissed claim that home-based LVI technician worked under employment contract.
insurance_2006_6967-2005
Unfinished studies due to missing exam disqualify unemployed benefit claimant as active student.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sivutoimiseen urakointiin oikeuttavan luvan nojalla sähkösuunnittelu-, konsultointija asennustoimintaa heinäkuusta 1984 alkaen päätoimensa ohella harjoittaneen sähköinsinöörin työmäärän yrityksessä ei katsottu olleen niin suuri, että se olisi ollut päätyöstä helmikuussa 1985 työttömäksi jäämisen jälkeen esteenä kokoaikaisen työn vastaanottamiselle. Insinööri oli hakenut jatkuvasti uutta päätyötä ja yrityksen toiminta oli toimeksiantojen puuttumisen vuoksi ollut hyvin vähäistä. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. V-jaosto