Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 25.9.1986/5764:85 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for unemployment benefits when job change during maternity leave was valid for childcare.

Case Number VakO 25.9.1986/5764:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim for unemployment benefits after modifying the Social Security Board's decision regarding a job change during maternity leave. The applicant argued that the shift from two-shift to three-shift work was invalid, but the court found the change legitimate for caring for children aged one and seven. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory waiting period (karenssi) was correctly removed, denying the benefit entitlement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Insurance Act s. 10; Social Security Act s. 10: A change of employment during maternity leave is valid if it is necessary for the care of young children, thereby legally removing the statutory waiting period for unemployment benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
maternity leave employment change unemployment benefits eligibility waiting period removal childcare necessity Social Security Act Insurance Court decision job shift validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Insurance Act s. 10
Social Security Act s. 10
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Työn muuttuminen äitiysloman aikana kaksivuorotyöstä kolmivuorotyöksi katsottiin päteväksi syyksi työstä eromaiseen 1 ja 7 -vuoden ikäisten lasten hoitamiseksi, minkä vuoksi karenssi poistettiin. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. V-jaosto