Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 20.11.1986/4996:85 AI generated

Insurance court allows pension adjustment due to clear error in LEL scheme application despite time lapse.

Case Number VakO 20.11.1986/4996:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court of Finland modified the pension board's decision to adjust the claimant's pension. The court found that while the LEL pension scheme could not be retroactively corrected due to the passage of time, a clear error existed in its application. Consequently, the court ordered a partial adjustment to align the pension with the TEL scheme calculation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10 of the Act on the Administration of the State Pension Fund; s. 10 of the Act on the Administration of the State Pension Fund: A pension adjustment is permissible if a clear error in the application of a specific pension scheme is identified, even if the error was not corrected retroactively due to the lapse of time.

Keywords

AI generated
pension adjustment state pension fund retroactive correction clear error time lapse insurance court pension calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10 of the Act on the Administration of the State Pension Fund
AI generated
insurance_1984_3793-1984
Court ruled fragmented work periods constitute one continuous employment relationship for pension eligibility.
insurance_2003_8729-2001
Insurance Court dismissed appeal; early pension start date determined separately for public and private sector laws.
insurance_1969_4284-1968
Insurance court dismissed pension claim adjustment due to employee's prior sick leave period exceeding seven months.
insurance_2004_2736-2003
Part-time pension terminated retroactively when earnings exceeded 70% threshold, but effective date set to next month.
insurance_1973_3854-1972
Insurance court dismissed claim for separate employment contracts due to continuous factory dismantling work.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kirvesmies oli työskennellyt puunjalostustehtaan rakennusosaston työssä vuodesta 1960, aluksi rakennustyömaalla ja vuodesta 1963 uudisrakennuksilla. Työsuhde oli tarkoitettu ympärivuotiseksi ja toistaiseksi voimassa olevaksi. 10.12.1973 lukien hänet oli siiretty yhtiön rakennuskunnossapitotyöhön tehdasalueelle. Kirvesmies oli vakuutettu LEL:n mukaan 1.7.1962-9.12.1973 ja TEL:n mukaan 10.12.1973-18.3.1984. Kun LEL-eläkejärjestelyä ei voitu osoittaa selvästi virheelliseksi, ei sitä ollut muutettava useiden vuosien kuluttua takautuvasti. Vertailulaskelman mukaan kokonaan TEL:n mukaiseksi muutettu eläke olisi vuonna 1986 ollut noin 200 markkaa kuukaudessa pienempi. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. III-jaosto