Unemployment benefits dismissed because insufficient time was allocated for childcare during two-shift work.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request to reinstate unemployment benefits, ruling that the labor board's decision to remove the benefit period was legally sound. The claimant argued that the two-shift work schedule did not provide adequate time to arrange childcare for their five-year-old child, violating the requirement for reasonable time allocation. The court upheld the decision, finding that the labor board correctly determined the claimant failed to meet the statutory criteria for benefit retention.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUnemployment Insurance Act; Social Insurance Act: When a worker's two-shift schedule prevents reasonable time for childcare, the unemployment benefit period may be lawfully removed if the worker cannot prove adequate arrangements were made.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kaksivuorotyön vastaanottamiseksi ei äidille katsottu varatun kohtuullista aikaa 5-vuotiaan lapsen hoidon järjestämiseksi, minkä vuoksi karenssi poistettiin. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. V-jaosto Samoin VAKO 4259:85, 26.03.1986