Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 26.3.1986/4916:85 AI generated

Unemployment benefits dismissed because insufficient time was allocated for childcare during two-shift work.

Case Number VakO 26.3.1986/4916:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request to reinstate unemployment benefits, ruling that the labor board's decision to remove the benefit period was legally sound. The claimant argued that the two-shift work schedule did not provide adequate time to arrange childcare for their five-year-old child, violating the requirement for reasonable time allocation. The court upheld the decision, finding that the labor board correctly determined the claimant failed to meet the statutory criteria for benefit retention.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Insurance Act; Social Insurance Act: When a worker's two-shift schedule prevents reasonable time for childcare, the unemployment benefit period may be lawfully removed if the worker cannot prove adequate arrangements were made.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment benefits two-shift work childcare arrangements reasonable time allocation benefit suspension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Unemployment Insurance Act
Social Insurance Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kaksivuorotyön vastaanottamiseksi ei äidille katsottu varatun kohtuullista aikaa 5-vuotiaan lapsen hoidon järjestämiseksi, minkä vuoksi karenssi poistettiin. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. V-jaosto Samoin VAKO 4259:85, 26.03.1986