Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 6.11.1986/3710:85 AI generated

Insurance court ruled that specific ship roles require TEL Act application over LEL Act per collective agreement.

Case Number VakO 6.11.1986/3710:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the pension board's decision to apply the TEL Act rather than the LEL Act to certain ship personnel. The plaintiff argued for LEL Act applicability, but the court found that the collective agreement explicitly designated the ship's engine officer, mechanic, and bosun as employees of the tug captain. Consequently, the court determined that the TEL Act governs their employment relationship, rejecting the plaintiff's request for a change.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 1 TEL; s. 1 LEL: The collective agreement's designation of specific ship roles as subordinate to the tug captain mandates application of the TEL Act, excluding the LEL Act for those employees.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement employment classification pension legislation ship personnel statutory application

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 1 TEL
s. 1 LEL
AI generated
insurance_1987_1318-1986
Reinstatement to same employer after service triggers continuous service leave, requiring pension from all periods.
insurance_1991_6081-1990
Insurance court ruled a puppet theater visitor agreement constituted an indefinite-term employment relationship subject to TEL.
insurance_1986_2943-1984
Insurance court ruled workers in sawmill peeling areas are covered by general liability, not forestry-specific insurance.
insurance_1982_11673-1981
Insurance court dismissed claim that multi-year TV show contracts constitute a single continuous employment relationship.
insurance_1985_3653-1984
Insurance court ruled TEL applies to farm workers at artificial insemination centers, not LEL, due to job nature.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Satamahinaajan konepäällikköä, konemestaria ja perämiestä oli hinaajan päällikön ohella pidettävä toimihenkilöinä kuten alan työehtosopimuksessa oli määritelty. Näin ollen heihin oli sovellettava TEL:a eikä LEL:a. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. (Äänestys 5 2) Laajennettu jaosto