Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 4.6.1986/3146:85 AI generated

Farming family's right to reside on land for 5 years before transfer was upheld against relocation order.

Case Number VakO 4.6.1986/3146:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court reversed the Pension Board's decision to relocate a farming family from their home to the farm. The court found that the family had lived near the property since the mid-1960s and possessed a special reason to reside on the land immediately prior to the transfer in 1986. Consequently, the court ruled that the family's right to remain on the farm was protected under the relevant insurance regulations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Social Insurance Act: A farming family's right to reside on the farm for five years immediately preceding the transfer of ownership is protected when special circumstances justify deviation from the general relocation requirement.

Keywords

AI generated
farming family residence land transfer rights relocation order reversal special circumstances exception insurance court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Social Insurance Act
AI generated
insurance_1984_540-1983
Insurance court dismissed farmer's claim to return half pension due to alleged failure to reside on farm.
insurance_1984_1690-1983
Insurance court denied spousal succession pension due to lack of permanent residence on the farm.
insurance_1983_4191-1982
Early pension granted to farmer under land lease contract despite partial income from farming work.
kho-precedent_2015_1
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court allows tax-free gain from selling half a plot where the taxpayer lived for years, despite a new building existing. The court ruled that the original residence's location qualifies for tax exemption under the Income Tax Act. The decision clarifies that the existence of a replacement building does not negate the tax-free status of the land portion sold.
insurance_1980_7607-1979
Insurance court dismissed wife's claim for half farm income due to lack of evidence showing increased work contribution.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Luovuttajat olivat siitä lähtien, kun sukupolvenvaihdostila siirtyi heidän omistukseensa 1960-luvun puolivälissä ja isäntä siirryi vuonna 1976 päätoimiseksi maanviljelijäksi, vakinaisesti asuneet omakotitalossa noin 6 kilometrin päässä tilalta, joka käsitti 26,19 hehtaaria peltoa ja 40,98 hehtaaria metsää. Asiassa esitetyn selvityksen perusteella katsottiin olevan olemassa erityinen syy poiketa vaatimuksesta asua viljelmällä 5 vuotta välittömästi ennen luovutusta. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. (Äänestys 3-2) I-jaosto