Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 13.5.1986/1657:85 AI generated

Court held intermittent self-employed work meeting annual minimum duration and income thresholds counts as continuous for YEL insurance.

Case Number VakO 13.5.1986/1657:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court upheld the Pensions Board's decision regarding the applicant's eligibility for YEL insurance benefits. The applicant argued that their intermittent self-employed activities, totaling over four months and exceeding the annual income minimum, should be treated as continuous under the relevant statute. The court agreed, ruling that such work satisfies the continuity requirement for a single period of at least four months.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

YEL-laki 1 § 3 momentti 1 kohta; intermittent self-employed work meeting annual duration and income thresholds counts as continuous for insurance eligibility purposes.

Keywords

AI generated
YEL insurance self-employed continuity annual minimum duration income threshold pension eligibility intermittent work single period calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
YEL-laki 1 § 3 momentti 1 kohta
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Yrittäjätoiminnan, joka toimintaan varsinaisesti kuluneen ajan huomioon ottaen ei ollut kestänyt yrittäjätoiminnan vähimmäisaikaa neljää kuukautta vuodessa ja josta saadut ansiot olivat ylittäneet vuotuisen vähimmäisrajan, katsottiin kestäneen YEL:n 1 §:n 3 momentin 1 kohdan tarkoittamalla tavalla yhdenjaksoisesti vähintään neljä kuukautta. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. I-jaosto