Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 4.9.1986/1466:85 AI generated

Insurance court ruled that repeated employment periods must be treated as a single continuous term for benefit calculation.

Case Number VakO 4.9.1986/1466:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court modified the Pensions Board's decision regarding Muusikon työskentelyn Oy's employment history with Yleisradio Ab. The court found that multiple distinct employment periods, characterized by continuity and sufficient remuneration, constituted a single continuous term in the mind of the relevant authority. Consequently, the court applied the appropriate benefit scale (TEL) to the aggregated duration rather than treating the periods separately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10 of the Insurance Act 1959; When multiple employment periods are continuous and remunerated, they constitute a single term for benefit calculation purposes.

Keywords

AI generated
continuous employment term benefit calculation scale repeated employment periods insurance law pension benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10 of the Insurance Act 1959
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Muusikon työskentelyn Oy. Yleisradio Ab:lle 8.9.1959-30.6.1965, 5.10.1965-31.5.1968, 10.9.1968-31.12.1969, 20.1.1970-26.11.1971, 30.3.1972-30.11.1972, 5.2.1973-8.3.1973 ja 14.1.1975-13.2.1975 katsottiin huomioon ottaen työskentelyn toistuvuus ja jatkuvuus sekä palkkioiden suuruus ja maksukerrat olleen mainittuina ajanjaksoina TEL:n mielessä yhdenjaksoista ja niihin näin ollen oli sovellettava TEL:a. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. (Äänestys 14 3) Täysistunto