Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 21.11.1985/5202:84 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for full repayment of erroneously paid pension, ordering only half restitution based on recipient's circumstances.

Case Number VakO 21.11.1985/5202:84
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court modified the Pension Board's decision to order the recipient to repay only half of the erroneously paid supplementary pension. The court found that while the pension was paid beyond the contract's scope, the recipient's overall financial situation justified a partial rather than full restitution. Consequently, the court ruled that the recipient must return 407,199.45 marks, representing 50% of the overpayment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

11 § of the Supplementary Pension Act; The court may order partial restitution of erroneously paid supplementary pension when the recipient's overall financial circumstances justify mitigation of the repayment obligation.

Keywords

AI generated
erroneous pension payment supplementary pension contract partial restitution order financial circumstances mitigation Insurance Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
11 § of the Supplementary Pension Act
AI generated
insurance_1983_1563-1982
Insurance court denied full disability pension due to insufficient medical evidence proving permanent work capacity loss.
insurance_1984_3527-1983
Insurance court dismissed early pension claim as less favorable than unemployment benefit.
insurance_1990_1578-1990
Insurance court dismissed pension claim due to insufficient investigation of total pension security coverage.
insurance_2004_9669-2002
Insurance court dismissed appeal claiming combined pension was lower than single pension due to coordination.
insurance_2012_6511-2011
Insurance Court allows waiver of social security overpayment due to Social Security Board's procedural errors and excessive delay.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vanhuuseläke oli myönnetty virheellisesti siten, että TEL:n 11 §:n mukaiseen rekisteröityyn lisäeläkevakuutussopimukseen perustuvaa lisävanhuuseläkettä oli maksettu perusvanhuuseläkkeen myöntämisen jälkeenkin. Eläkettä oli suoritettu liikaa 1.12.1981-30.11.1983 81.435,89 markkaa. Eläkkeensaajan olosuhteet kokonaisuudessaan huomioon ottaen aiheettomasti maksetusta edusta määrättiin perittäväksi takaisin puolet. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. II -jaosto