Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 15.10.1985/391:85 AI generated

Insurance court allows remote door lock installation for a paralyzed man as invalidity care vehicle equipment.

Case Number VakO 15.10.1985/391:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court ordered the installation of remote-controlled door lock systems in the applicant's vehicle as part of his invalidity care. The 25-year-old male suffered spinal cord injuries and paralysis in his lower limbs following a traffic accident. The court ruled that these devices were necessary to enable the applicant to safely operate his vehicle independently.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Invalidity Care Act: The court established that installing remote-controlled door locks constitutes valid invalidity care equipment when a traffic accident victim suffers paralysis preventing independent vehicle operation.

Keywords

AI generated
invalidity care equipment remote door control traffic accident injury vehicle accessibility spinal cord paralysis insurance court ruling independent vehicle use

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Invalidity Care Act
AI generated
insurance_1985_1245-1985
Insurance court denied invalidity care phone for car use due to lack of medical necessity.
insurance_2009_3334-2009
Insurance court dismissed ski lift chair as non-essential rehabilitation aid for partial spinal cord injury patient.
insurance_1982_6514-1981
Insurance court rules phone purchase necessary for blind person's mobility and orders coverage.
insurance_2006_8319-2005
Insurance court lacks jurisdiction to assess causation between injury and accident under specific disability compensation law.
insurance_1984_80-1984
Insurance court allowed costs for a mobile phone as necessary rehabilitation treatment to maintain work capacity.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Liikenneonnettomuudessa selkäytimen vioittuman ja sen seurauksena mm. alaraajojen halvaantumisen saaneelle 25-vuotiaalle mieshenkilölle määrättiin henkilöauton käyttämiseksi invalidihuoltona kustannettavaksi autotallin oven kauko-ohjauslaitteet. II -jaosto