Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 28.3.1985/3789:84 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed annulment request for old pension decision due to lack of valid grounds.

Case Number VakO 28.3.1985/3789:84
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court rejected the annulment application filed in August 1984 regarding a 1971 pension decision. The applicant, born in 1911, claimed an error in classifying their employer's insurance as a general pension, resulting in an overpayment of 860.67 marks monthly. The court dismissed the request because over five years had passed without the applicant presenting compelling reasons to annul the now-final decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Social Insurance Act: A claim to annul a final administrative decision is inadmissible if filed after the expiration of the statutory limitation period and without presenting compelling reasons justifying the delay.

Keywords

AI generated
annulment limitation period final administrative decision compelling reasons overpayment correction pension classification error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Social Insurance Act
AI generated
insurance_1983_248-1982
Insurance court dismissed pension revocation claim where prior pension calculation included another person's insurance contributions.
insurance_1983_948-1983
Insurance court dismissed pension annulment request due to lack of compelling reasons for correcting erroneous income data.
insurance_1979_2776-1978
Insurance court dismissed claim for backdated pension benefits due to lack of statutory correction circumstances under MYEL 8 § 6.
insurance_1983_4254-1982
Insurance court dismissed invalidation request for disability pension where insured continued acting as farm manager post-transfer.
insurance_2004_9669-2002
Insurance court dismissed appeal claiming combined pension was lower than single pension due to coordination.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vuonna 1911 syntyneen henkilön vanhuuseläkettä laskettaessa hänen ottamaansa työnantajan vakuutusta oli erehdyksessä käsitelty työntekijäin eläkelain mukaisena TEL:n peruseläkkeenä ja sen vuoksi oli eläkettä oli eläkelaitoksen 21.01.1971 antaman päätöksen nojalla maksettu liikaa 860,67 markkaa kuukaudessa. Ennen vakuutusoikeudelle 07.08.1984 saapuneen purkuhakemuksen tekemistä oli kulunut yli viisi vuotta siitä, kun sanottu päätös oli saanut lainvoiman. Koska ei ollut esitetty erittäin painavia syitä eikä muutoinkaan ollut ilmennyt sellaisia seikkoja, joiden perusteella purkuedellytykset olisivat olleet olemassa, hakemus hylättiin. (Äänestys 3-2) III -jaosto