Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 20.6.1985/3653:84 AI generated

Insurance court ruled TEL applies to farm workers at artificial insemination centers, not LEL, due to job nature.

Case Number VakO 20.6.1985/3653:84
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court rejected the appeal against the Pensions Board's decision regarding pension classification for workers at an artificial insemination center. Although these employees performed tasks like metalwork and facility maintenance alongside their primary duties, the court determined their employment fell under the Agricultural Employees' Pension Act (TEL) rather than the General Employees' Pension Act (LEL). The court emphasized that the overall nature of the work and the organization's purpose dictated the applicable pension scheme, resulting in a 3-2 vote to uphold the original decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 1 TEL; s. 1 LEL: The Agricultural Employees' Pension Act applies to workers whose primary duties are tied to the agricultural nature of the employer's purpose, even if ancillary tasks involve general construction or maintenance, whereas the General Employees' Pension Act does not cover such specialized agricultural entities.

Keywords

AI generated
Agricultural Employees Pension Act General Employees Pension Act Artificial Insemination Center Pension Classification Employment Nature Determination Mixed Duties Assessment Insurance Court Jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 1 TEL
s. 1 LEL
AI generated
insurance_1986_2943-1984
Insurance court ruled workers in sawmill peeling areas are covered by general liability, not forestry-specific insurance.
insurance_1979_5019-1977
Insurance court dismissed claim that industrial pipe fitters' employees were not covered by TEL pension scheme.
insurance_1974_1400-1973
Insurance court ruled membership in a wage negotiation committee is a trust role, not an employment relationship.
insurance_1986_3450-1985
Insurance court ruled translator was an employee subject to TEL, increasing pension benefits based on earnings.
insurance_1985_1761-1983
Employee pension eligibility determined by degree of subordination to company leadership during employment period.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Keinosiemennysyhdistyksen maatilalla, sonninavetassa ja karjunavetassa työskenteleviin henkilöihin oli yhdistyksen tarkoituksen ja työn pääasiallisen luonteen huomioon ottaen sovellettava TEL:a eikä LEL:a. Keinosiemennykseen liittyvien tehtävien lisäksi näiden työntekijöiden työnä oli ollut peltotyöt, kiinteistöjen hoito ja laitteistojen asennus sekä huoltotyöt keinosiemennysasemalla. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. (Äänestys 3-2) III -jaosto