Student injury on camp not covered by work injury law as no employment relationship existed.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the claim for work injury benefits against the parish union regarding a student injured while leading a football match on a camp. The student argued he was in an employment relationship under the Work Injury Act, but the court found the camp activities were voluntary and outside the scope of employment. Consequently, the statutory definition of a work relationship was not met, and the claim was rejected.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedWork Injury Act s. 1; Work Injury Act s. 2: An injury sustained while performing voluntary duties on a camp does not constitute a work injury if no employment relationship exists between the participant and the organizing body.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Opiskelija oli ollut rippikoululeirillä ryhmän johtajana ja siellä jalkapallo-ottelussa vahingoittunut. Hänelle oli leirin ajalta suoritettu kirkon yleisvirkaehtosopimuksen mukaista päivärahaa 94 mk/vrk, josta ruoan osuutena oli vähennetty 50 %. Opiskelijan ei katsottu tapaturman sattuessa olleen tapaturmavakuutuslain 1 §:ssä tarkoitetussa työsuhteessa rippikoululeirin järjestäneseen seurakuntayhtymään. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. (Äänestys 3-2) I -jaosto