Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 24.1.1985/1761:83 AI generated

Employee pension eligibility determined by degree of subordination to company leadership during employment period.

Case Number VakO 24.1.1985/1761:83
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court upheld the Pension Board's decision that an employee employed from 1971 to 1974 was covered by the employee pension scheme. The court found the individual was sufficiently subordinate to the company's leadership and supervision, establishing a formal employment relationship rather than an independent contractor status. Consequently, the claim for pension benefits was granted based on this established subordination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vakuutusoikeuslaki 1971; Työntekijöiden eläkelaki 1971: An individual employed by a company is considered to be in an employment relationship subject to the employee pension scheme if they are sufficiently subordinate to the company's leadership and supervision.

Keywords

AI generated
employee pension scheme subordination to leadership employment relationship status independent contractor distinction pension eligibility criteria

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Vakuutusoikeuslaki 1971
Työntekijöiden eläkelaki 1971
AI generated
insurance_1985_10386-1981
Real estate agent deemed employee under pension law due to subordination to company leadership.
insurance_1981_8177-1979
Real estate agent deemed employee under pension law due to subordination in business leadership and supervision.
insurance_1974_1400-1973
Insurance court ruled membership in a wage negotiation committee is a trust role, not an employment relationship.
insurance_1984_3793-1984
Court ruled fragmented work periods constitute one continuous employment relationship for pension eligibility.
insurance_1977_5801-1976
Insurance court dismissed pension claim adjustment due to work stoppage not meeting statutory special cause criteria.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kiinteistötoimiston työssä 1971-1974 provisiopalkkaisena kiinteistönvälittäjänä ja samalla osan aikaa yrityksen apulaisjohtajana toimineen henkilön katsottiin olleen siinä määrin yrityksen johdon ja valvonnan alaisena, että hänen oli katsottava olleen työntekijäin eläkelain piiriin kuuluneessa työsuhteessa. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. I -jaosto