Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 10.10.1985/1686:85 AI generated

Insurance Court dismissed conflicting pension decisions based on strike participation under Finnish Insurance Law.

Case Number VakO 10.10.1985/1686:85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court of Finland dismissed conflicting pension decisions regarding employees who participated in a 1980 strike. The court reviewed applications from workers whose pension amounts had been determined differently by two separate divisions of the court. Relying on the Insurance Act, the court unified the rulings to ensure consistency in benefits for strike participants.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act s. 7; Insurance Court Act s. 31.7.1: When conflicting decisions exist on pension benefits for strike participants under the Insurance Act, the court must set aside the inconsistent ruling to establish a uniform application of the law.

Keywords

AI generated
Insurance Act strike participation pension benefits conflicting decisions unified ruling Insurance Court employment law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act s. 7
Insurance Court Act s. 31.7.1
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vakuutusoikeuden kaksi jaostoa olivat tehneet samassa työpaikassa olleiden ja vuonna 1980 samaan työtaisteluun 2.4.-12.5. osallistuneiden työntekijöiden eläkepalkan määräämisestä työntekijäin eläkelain 7 §:n 2 momentin nojalla erilaiset ratkaisut. Kielteisen päätöksen saaneen työntekijän hakemuksesta vakuutusoikeuden päätös oikeudenkäymiskaaren 31 luvun 7 §:n 1 momentin 3 kohtaan nojautuen poistettiin. (Äänestys 5-2) Laajennettu jaosto