Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 14.5.1985/1271:84 AI generated

Worker injured during transport contract work not considered in statutory work accident insurance relationship.

Case Number VakO 14.5.1985/1271:84
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the claim that the plaintiff was in a statutory work accident insurance relationship with the defendant. The plaintiff, working under a verbal contract to transport goods and assist with tractor tire installation, suffered an injury while helping install tires. The court found that despite the plaintiff's assistance, the relationship did not meet the legal definition of a work accident insurance relationship under the relevant law. Consequently, the court upheld the original decision that the injury was not covered as a work accident.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Tapaturmavakuutuslain 1 §; A worker performing tasks under a verbal contract for remuneration and assisting in the execution of the main task is not deemed to be in a work accident insurance relationship if the assistance does not constitute a separate or dominant part of the work.

Keywords

AI generated
work accident insurance verbal contract statutory relationship assisting in work insurance court decision remuneration injury coverage

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Tapaturmavakuutuslain 1 §
AI generated
insurance_1977_7396-1976
Insurance court allows compensation for minor finger injury sustained while returning to work after a previous work accident.
labour_2008_120
Labour court dismissed union's claim that employer breached collective agreement by failing to insure off-duty injury.
kko-precedent_1997_115
Supreme Court dismisses accident claim for intentional poisoning occurring after work duties ended during business trip.
kko-other_2011_1118
Supreme Court dismisses claim that night commute accident occurred in work-related circumstances under Finnish Work Accident Act.
insurance_1978_9914-1977
Insurance court dismissed claim for accidental injury when gun malfunction caused discharge during departure for work.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

X:n, joka oli suullisesti sopinut Y:n kanssa tukkien kuljetuksesta isänsä tilalta urakkapalkalla ja joka auttaessaan Y:n kuljetusta suorittanutta poikaa telojen asentamisessa traktorin renkaisiin oli vahingoittunut, ei katsottu tapaturman sattuessa olleen tapaturmavakuutuslain 1 §:ssä tarkoitetussa työsuhteessa Y:hyn. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. I -jaosto