Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 22.5.1984/366:84 AI generated

Work injury claim dismissed because laundry accident at a laundromat did not occur during agricultural work duties.

Case Number VakO 22.5.1984/366:84
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Agricultural Pension Fund denied compensation for a farmer who slipped and injured his arm while washing laundry containing both leisure and work clothes. The Accident Board rejected the claim, ruling the incident did not happen during agricultural work or related conditions, a decision upheld by the court. The court dismissed the appeal because the activity of washing mixed laundry at a laundromat was not considered part of the farmer's professional duties or work-related circumstances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act 1984; Accident Board Act 1984: An accident occurring while washing mixed leisure and work clothes at a laundromat is not considered a work-related injury if it does not take place during the performance of professional duties or in work-related conditions.

Keywords

AI generated
agricultural work injury laundry accident mixed clothing work-related conditions professional duties accident board compensation denial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act 1984
Accident Board Act 1984
AI generated
insurance_1984_2422-1984
Insurance court dismissed claim that summer farm work constituted an employment relationship under the Workmen's Compensation Act.
labour_1974_88
Labor unions fined for failing to take sufficient measures to restore peace during strikes.
labour_2006_1
Employer dismissed worker; union won damages; unemployment fund's cost claim dismissed.
labour_1981_142
Union dismissed for failing to stop intermittent strikes violating collective agreement management rights.
labour_1971_13
Labor court dismisses union compensation claims for violating work peace obligations during strikes.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Henkilö oli pessyt pesutuvassa pyykkiä, joka käsitti sekä vapaa-ajanvaatteita että työvaatteita, liukastunut ja kaatunut vahingoittuen oikeaan yläraajaan. Maatalousyrittäjien eläkelaitos oli evännyt korvauksen ja tapaturmalautakunta oli hylännyt valituksen katsoen, ettei tapaturma ollut sattunut maatalousyrittäjätyössä tai siitä johtuvissa olosuhteissa. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Laajennettu jaosto (äänestys 4-3)