Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 25.1.1984/2402:82 AI generated

Insurance court upheld insurer's right to recover pension capital from daughter who breached farm succession agreement.

Case Number VakO 25.1.1984/2402:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court upheld the insurer's decision to recover one-quarter of the pension capital from the daughter for breaching her commitment to continue farming. The daughter sold the farm to her brother, who assumed the obligation, but the daughter failed to fulfill her original duty. The court ruled that the insurer could claim the full pension capital value if the brother subsequently violated his assumption of the agreement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Insurance Act 1984; Section 11 of the Insurance Act 1984: The insurer is entitled to recover pension capital from a beneficiary who breaches the conditions of the farm succession agreement, with the right to claim the full amount if the successor also fails to comply.

Keywords

AI generated
farm succession agreement pension capital recovery insurance contract breach beneficiary obligation successor liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Insurance Act 1984
Section 11 of the Insurance Act 1984
AI generated
insurance_1978_8866-1976
Insurance court dismissed pension decision removal and rejected recovery of undue benefit due to erroneous consolidation.
insurance_2003_4221-1999
Disability pension retroactive termination date determined by nearest possible payment date under pension regulations.
insurance_2011_1491-2010
Court dismisses claim to waive recovery of disability pension paid under a final, valid decision.
insurance_2009_5783-2008
Court allows surrender support despite partial farm sale, ruling individual ownership suffices for legal surrender.
insurance_1990_578-1990
Farming land not transferred to next generation means succession pension requirements are not met.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Äidille oli myönnetty sukupolvenvaihdoseläke ja tytär oli tehnyt sitoumuksen viljelyn jatkamisesta. Vuoden kuluttua tytär myi tilan veljelleen, joka allekirjoitti sitoumuksen viljelyn jatkamisesta sen jäljellä olevaksi voimassaoloajaksi. MELA: Tytär oli rikkonut sitoumuksen eikä siihen ollut hyväksyttävää syytä. Koska hänen veljensä oli sitoutunut noudattamaan viljelysopimuksen ehtoja sen jäljellä olevan ajan, MELA määräsi tyttäreltä perittäväksi 1/4 sukupolvenvaihdoseläkkeen pääoma-arvosta. Mikäli veli rikkoo antamansa sitoumuksen, sisarelta peritään koko sukupolvenvaihdoseläkkeen pääoma-arvo. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. VI -jaosto