Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 22.2.1984/2147:83 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim where injured farmer's ability to perform health inspector duties remained above 10% threshold.

Case Number VakO 22.2.1984/2147:83
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Finnish Insurance Court dismissed the claim against the health inspector, who was also a part-time farmer. The injured farmer suffered a permanent disability to his right lower limb while working as a farmer but remained capable of performing the health inspector's duties during his period of temporary incapacity. The court ruled that since the farmer's ability to perform the health inspector's work had not decreased by at least 10%, the statutory threshold for compensation was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Disability Insurance Act: Compensation is not payable if the injured person's ability to perform the duties of the health inspector has not decreased by at least 10%.

Keywords

AI generated
disability compensation threshold health inspector duties permanent disability assessment insurance court jurisdiction temporary incapacity period

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Disability Insurance Act
AI generated
insurance_1985_2283-1984
Farmer in cohabitation deemed an insured agricultural entrepreneur under insurance law despite not formally joining the scheme.
insurance_1985_2747-1984
Insurance court denies claim when injury occurred before marriage but after joint farm operation began.
insurance_1984_4396-1983
Insurance Court final decision on pension benefits is not appealable to Supreme Court.
insurance_1982_8553-1981
Work injury claim denied by employer due to disputed causation between work duties and shoulder inflammation.
insurance_2007_5848-2006
Finnish Insurance Court allows occupational asthma compensation despite negative exposure tests due to high probability of causation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Terveystarkastaja, joka toimi osa-aikaisena maanviljelijänä, oli vahingoittunut maanviljelystyössään tapaturmaisesti saaden oikean alaraajan ruhjevamman ja hän oli työkyvytön 11.9.1982-15.9.1982, jona aikana hän ei kuitenkaan ollut poissa terveystarkastajan työstään. Koska vahingoittunut oli ollut kykenevä tekemään terveystarkastajan työtään, hänen kykynsä tehdä työtään ei ollut kokonaisuudessaan alentunut vähintään 10 %. III -jaosto