Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 25.10.1983/4966:82 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for work-related injury compensation due to lack of causal link between repetitive motion and diagnosed conditions.

Case Number VakO 25.10.1983/4966:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the insured's claim for compensation regarding a work-related injury sustained in 1976. The insured alleged that repetitive cable-tying motions caused diagnosed shoulder and arm conditions, but the insurer disputed the causal connection. The court rejected the claim because the medical evidence did not establish a direct causal link between the specific repetitive motions and the diagnosed illnesses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Work Injury Act; Liability Act: A claim for work-related injury compensation is denied when the medical evidence fails to establish a direct causal link between the specific repetitive motions performed and the diagnosed medical conditions.

Keywords

AI generated
work-related injury compensation repetitive motion disorder causal link requirement insurance liability assessment occupational disease diagnosis

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Work Injury Act
Liability Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vuodesta 1973 alkaen kaapelinsitojana työskennellyt henkilö oli joulukuussa 1976 ollut lääkärissä oikean yläraajansa kipeytymisen takia arvellen sen aiheutuneen kaapelinsidontatyössä suorittamistaan yksipuolisista työliikkeistä. Hänen todettiin potevan oikean kyynärvarren jännetupentulehdusta, oikean olkaluun ulomman sivunastan tulehdusta ja oikean olkavarren oireyhtymää. VAKO epäsi korvauksen. III -jaosto KKO 27.3.1984: ei valituslupaa.