Maintenance pension denied because subsequent divorce occurred within three years of the first divorce.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the applicant's request for a maintenance pension following the death of her first husband. Although her second marriage had been dissolved, the court ruled that less than three years had elapsed since that dissolution. Consequently, the statutory requirement for a three-year gap between divorces was not met, leading to the denial of the pension benefit.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSotilasvammalain 3 § 2 mom.; A maintenance pension is denied if the applicant's subsequent marriage is dissolved within three years of the dissolution of the first marriage.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Henkilö oli hakenut huoltoeläkettä sodan johdosta kuolleen ensimmäisen miehensä jälkeen. Hänen toinen avioliittonsa oli purkautunut. VAKO: Henkilön myöhemmin solmitun avioliiton purkautumisesta ei ollut vielä kulunut 3 vuotta ja huoltoeläke evättiin. I -jaosto KKO 28.9.1983=VAKO. (Sotilasvammalain soveltamisalan laajentamisesta annettu laki 3 § 2 mom.)