Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 7.12.1983/4254:82 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed invalidation request for disability pension where insured continued acting as farm manager post-transfer.

Case Number VakO 7.12.1983/4254:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's request to revoke a disability pension granted in 1980 and 1981. Although the farm had legally transferred to the applicant's son and brother in 1974, the court found the applicant had continued to act as the farm manager in practice. The court ruled that the pension was based on the applicant's actual management role, which persisted despite the formal transfer, thus validating the original decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 24 of the Insurance Act 1980; The court held that a disability pension based on the applicant's actual management of a farm remains valid even after a formal transfer of ownership, provided the applicant continued to perform the managerial duties in practice.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension farm management invalidation request practical control insurance law pension revocation legal transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 24 of the Insurance Act 1980
AI generated
insurance_1984_2578-1983
Insurance Court dismissed pension appeal where future earnings were correctly considered in disability pension calculation.
insurance_1984_5226-1982
Insurance court dismissed sister's claim for work income allowance due to brother's prior approval of land area.
insurance_1983_948-1983
Insurance court dismissed pension annulment request due to lack of compelling reasons for correcting erroneous income data.
insurance_1981_11909-1979
Insurance court dismissed disability pension claim for commercial orchard work as it falls under YEL, not MYEL.
insurance_1983_248-1982
Insurance court dismissed pension revocation claim where prior pension calculation included another person's insurance contributions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

MELA oli 4.11.1980 ja 6.2.1981 antamillaan päätöksillä myöntänyt emännälle työkyvyttömyyseläkettä 1.12.1979 alkaen. Eläkkeen määräämisen perusteena oli 1.1.1970 alkaen vahvistettu sekä 24.5.1978 annetulla päätöksellä 13.12.1977 lukien tarkistettu työtulo ja työkyvyttömyyden alkamisesta eläkeikään laskettu aika. Sen jälkeen, kun ilmeni, että tila oli jo 22.3.1974 siirtynyt emännän pojalle ja hänen veljelleen,MELA haki päätöstensä purkamista. Asiakirjoista ilmeni, että emäntä oli tosiasiallisesti toiminut tilalla emäntänä myös luopumisen jälkeen. VAKO ei suostunut purkuhakemukseen. V -jaosto