Insurance court dismissed claim for disability pension due to insufficient evidence of severe occupational strain.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Finnish Insurance Court dismissed the claim for disability pension filed by a 58-year-old merchant operating a private business from 1948 to 1981. The applicant argued that his continuous standing work and long daily hours constituted severe occupational strain, but the court found the evidence insufficient to meet the threshold for pension eligibility. Consequently, the application was rejected because the documented conditions did not substantiate the legal requirement for a disability pension.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInsurance Act; Disability Pension Act: Severe occupational strain must be substantiated by concrete evidence of continuous standing work and excessive daily hours to qualify for a disability pension.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Vuosina 1948-1981 torikauppiaana toimineen 58 -vuotiaan yrittäjän katsottiin olleen rasittavasa työssä. Ratkaisua tehtäessä otettiin huomioon työn luonne yksityisyrittäjänä, jatkuva seisomatyö ja työpäivien pituus. VI-jaosto