Insurance court dismissed mental distress damages claim due to lack of statutory authorization in state compensation law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the claim for 6,000 marks in mental distress damages following a lower court's ruling. The applicant argued for compensation based on general tort principles, but the court found no specific provision in the state compensation law authorizing such payments. Consequently, the court held that without explicit statutory authorization, the state cannot be ordered to pay for mental suffering.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedState Compensation Act; Mental Distress Damages: The state is not liable for mental distress damages unless explicitly authorized by statute.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kihlakunnanoikeus oli määrännyt suoritettavaksi korvausta henkisistä kärsimyksistä 6.000 markkaa. Korvausvaatimus hylättiin, koska rikosvahinkojen korvaamisesta valtion varoista annetussa laissa ei ollut säädetty suoritettavaksi korvausta henkisistä kärsimyksistä. I-jaosto