Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 20.12.1983/2984:83 AI generated

Insurance court dismisses claim where accident occurred during agricultural work and compensation already paid.

Case Number VakO 20.12.1983/2984:83
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the claim because the accident occurred during agricultural work, which falls under the scope of the compensation scheme. The Compensation Board had already determined the incident was work-related and ordered payment, which was subsequently made. Consequently, the court ruled that the matter was concluded and no further proceedings were necessary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act 1983; Work Accident Act 1983: When an accident occurs during agricultural work and compensation has been paid, the matter is considered concluded and no further legal action is required.

Keywords

AI generated
agricultural work accident work-related injury compensation insurance court jurisdiction compensation already paid procedural conclusion
AI generated
kko-other_2013_2056
Supreme Court dismissed insurance company's appeal regarding partial payment gap in work injury compensation claim.
kko-precedent_1989_154
Supreme Court allows partial accident compensation when pre-existing eye disease significantly reduced injury severity.
insurance_2000_5815-1998
Insurance court dismissed claim for agricultural accident benefits due to lack of direct causal link between work and injury.
insurance_1984_1741-1983
Insurance court dismissed claim for state compensation for injuries caused by assault rather than accident.
insurance_1985_151-1985
Insurance contract not terminated by bankruptcy filing without prior demand for payment or insolvency finding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Henkilö oli matkalla kauppaan hankkimaan heinäkorjuuväelle ruokaa sekä kalanmaksaöljyä ja kivennäisiä karjalle. Tapaturmalautakunta katsoi, että kysymyksessä oleva tapaturma oli kohdannut henkilöä hänen maatalousyrittäjätyöstään johtuvissa olosuhteissa ja määräsi suorittamaan korvauksen. VAKO: Koska korvaus oli suoritettu, lausunnon antaminen asiasta raukeaa. III -jaosto