Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 26.10.1983/2317:82 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed pension claim due to early farm control transfer before official ownership change.

Case Number VakO 26.10.1983/2317:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's pension claim because the farm was effectively controlled by the applicant's son before the formal transfer of ownership. Although the son had taken over management in December 1981, the official title transfer occurred in October 1981, creating a discrepancy in the timing of control versus legal ownership. The court ruled that the pension entitlement required the farm to be under the applicant's control at the specific date of the official transfer, which was not met in this instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10 of the Act on the Administration of the State Pension Fund; The pension entitlement for a farm depends on the applicant's actual control over the farm at the time of the official transfer of ownership, not merely on the timing of the transfer document itself.

Keywords

AI generated
State Pension Fund farm control timing ownership transfer date pension eligibility criteria actual management rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10 of the Act on the Administration of the State Pension Fund
AI generated
insurance_1977_6009-1976
Insurance court dismissed pension claim due to premature payment based on draft documents rather than final sale.
insurance_1990_1578-1990
Insurance court dismissed pension claim due to insufficient investigation of total pension security coverage.
insurance_1983_1563-1982
Insurance court denied full disability pension due to insufficient medical evidence proving permanent work capacity loss.
insurance_2003_10247-2001
Insurance court denied pension office liability for lawyer fees in retroactive legal aid proceedings where the office was not a party.
insurance_2003_2236-2002
Insurance court partially allowed appeal by creating technical break in employment due to part-time to full-time shift.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Tilakauppa oli tehty 24.10.1981, jolloin myös tilan omistusja hallintaoikeus siirtyivät luovuttajan pojalle. Luovutuksensaaja vapautui 3.1.1982 armeijasta, josta hän oli ollut lomalla 19.-27.12.1981 ja 1.-3.1.1982. Viljelmän tosiasiallisen hallinnan katsottiin siirtyneen joulukuussa 1981 ja eläke määrättiin maksettavaksi 1.1.1982 lukien. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. V -jaosto