Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 30.6.1983/2041:82 AI generated

Insurance court allowed pension recipient to receive both disability pension and work compensation for continued work.

Case Number VakO 30.6.1983/2041:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court of Finland allowed a pension recipient to receive both a disability pension and work compensation for work performed after the pension's start date. The recipient continued working as an auditor until October 1981, and the court ruled that the employer's payment for this work constituted compensation rather than sick leave wages. Consequently, the court modified the Social Security Board's decision to permit the recipient to claim both benefits simultaneously.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Social Insurance Act; Section 10 of the Social Insurance Act: A pension recipient may receive both a disability pension and work compensation if the work performed after the pension's start date is remunerated by the employer as compensation for work rather than as sick leave wages.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension work compensation concurrent benefits employer remuneration sick leave wages pension recipient Insurance Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Social Insurance Act
AI generated
insurance_1982_6965-1981
Insurance court dismissed pension claim adjustment due to prior sick pay and vacation allowance received.
insurance_1998_8656-1997
Court dismissed claim that university lecture duties constituted employment for pension purposes.
insurance_2022_21382-2021
Court denies private pension claim when current employment continues without essential change after state pension start.
insurance_2017_4614-2015
Insurance Court allows final settlement payments earned before termination to count for pension accrual.
insurance_1987_6082-1986
Unemployment benefit claim dismissed because claim period exceeded 360 days without national assistance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eläkkensaaja, jolle oli myönnetty työkyvyttömyyseläke 1.9.1981 alkaen, oli jatkanut työtään tilintarkastajana työnantajalleen 31.10.1981 saakka. Palkka, jota ei voitu pitää sairausajan palkkana vaan vastikkeena tehdystä työstä määrättiin maksettavaksi eläkkeensaajalle kuin myös samalta ajalta maksettu eläke eikä työnantajalle. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. II -jaosto