Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 1.1.1983/163:82 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed pension fund's claim for overdue insurance premiums and interest due to statute of limitations.

Case Number VakO 1.1.1983/163:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The pension fund sought payment of overdue insurance premiums and interest from a company for a period where a worker was erroneously omitted. The company argued the claim was time-barred under the insurance policy terms, leading the court to order the removal of the assessed amount. Consequently, the pension fund's request for payment was dismissed as the claim exceeded the limitation period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 5 of the TEL supplementary insurance policy terms; The claim for insurance premiums and interest is time-barred if the statutory limitation period has expired, thereby preventing the insurer from enforcing the debt.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations insurance premium collection time bar defense pension fund liability interest calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 5 of the TEL supplementary insurance policy terms
ETK statement of 4 July 1980
AI generated
admin_2003_rovaniemi__145
Court allows deduction of unpaid pension insurance premiums from pension when business partnership ceased paying.
insurance_1984_498-1983
Insurance court dismissed claim for pension contribution from open company partners under specific exemption law.
insurance_2004_5297-2003
Insurance court dismissed appeal against pension board's decision to recalculate pension without downward adjustment.
insurance_2006_6441-2005
Insurance court dismissed appeal; pension board lacked jurisdiction over pre-bankruptcy debt under Bankruptcy Act.
insurance_2008_1492-2006
Court dismissed appeal; worker's summer house duties constituted employment under pension law, not a trust role.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eläkelaitos oli 12.2.1981 vaatinut r.y:n suorittamaan TEL vakuutusmaksua 3697,15 markkaa ja maksuun liittynyttä perustekorkoa 1289,58 markkaa. Eläkelaitos oli tapahtuneen virheen johdosta jättänyt vakuutusmaksun perimättä yhden työntekijän 1.7.1976-31.12.1977 kestäneen työsuhteen osalta. R.y. vaati suorituksesta vapauttamista kokonaan tai ainakin perustekoron osalta. VAKO: Vakuutusmaksu oli vuoden 1976 työsuhteen perusteella vanhentunut. R.y:lle määrätty maksuunpano korkoineen vuoden 1976 työsuhteen osalta poistettiin. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. I -jaosto TEL:n mukaisen perustevakuutuksen vakuutusehtojen 5 §, ETK:n lausunto 4.7.1980