Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 17.2.1983/1258:82 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for state compensation for theft by nursing home patients.

Case Number VakO 17.2.1983/1258:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The insurance court dismissed the claim for state compensation regarding financial losses caused by nursing home patients stealing funds and forging documents. The patients, acting without full capacity, committed continued fraud and attempted further withdrawals using a forged power of attorney. The court upheld the Accident Insurance Board's decision that these losses did not qualify as property damage under the relevant state compensation law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Act 1000/1971 on state compensation for damage; Act 1000/1971 on state compensation for damage: Losses resulting from criminal acts by persons lacking full capacity are not compensable from state funds as property damage.

Keywords

AI generated
state compensation property damage criminal acts nursing home patients fraudulent theft full capacity Accident Insurance Board

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act 1000/1971 on state compensation for damage
AI generated
insurance_1984_435-1984
Insurance court dismissed claim for state compensation for stolen checks as non-property damage.
insurance_1981_10-1981
Insurance court ruled bonus loss from vehicle damage counts as property damage under state liability law.
insurance_1982_4093-1981
Insurance court ruled theft compensation must be reduced if caused by a state-compensable offender.
kko-precedent_1996_98
Supreme Court allows compensation for legal costs in public road information proceedings based on necessity and actual expenses.
insurance_1981_1765-1980
Insurance court denied claim that criminal compensation exceeds civil damages when refusing tort claims.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sairaalasta lomalla olleet laitoshoidokit olivat saaneet henkilöltä pankin säästökirjan rahojen nostamista varten sopimuksen mukaisesti ja olivat nostetuista rahoista anastaneet itselleen 6.000 mk ja väärennetyllä valtakirjalla yrittäneet edelleen nostaa rahaa henkilön tililtä. RO katsoi laitoshoidokkien syyllistyneen täyttä ymmärrystä vailla olevina jatkettuun rikokseen, joka käsitti törkeän kavalluksen ja jatketun petoksen ja määräsi heidät yhteisvastuullisesti korvaamaan henkilölle 6.000 mk. Tapaturmavirasto katsoi, ettei aiheutunutta taloudellista menetystä ollut pidettävä rikosvahinkojen korvaamisesta valtion varoista annetussa laissa tarkoitettuna esinevahinkona. Tapaturmaviraston päätöstä ei muutettu. VII-jaosto