Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 22.1.1982/9597:79 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed appeal; Supreme Court ruled fire brigade compensation takes precedence over sickness insurance.

Case Number VakO 22.1.1982/9597:79
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland revoked the Insurance Court's decision of January 22, 1982, which had refused to examine a claim for state compensation. The applicant argued for priority between compensation under the Fire Brigade Act and the Sickness Insurance Act. The court held that compensation under the Fire Brigade Act is primary compared to sickness insurance benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Fire Brigade Act 35 §; Sickness Insurance Act 27 § 1: Compensation under the Fire Brigade Act takes precedence over compensation under the Sickness Insurance Act.

Keywords

AI generated
Fire Brigade Act Sickness Insurance Act compensation priority state compensation insurance court appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Fire Brigade Act 35 §
Sickness Insurance Act 27 § 1
AI generated
insurance_1977_6687-1976
Insurance court dismisses claim where late notice caused by minor's age lacks serious reasons.
insurance_1976_3782-1976
Insurance court dismissed late claim due to lack of valid reasons for over six-year delay.
insurance_1984_3913-1983
Insurance court dismissed claim for occupational disease compensation due to lack of causal link between work and injury.
insurance_1981_9101-1980
Insurance court rules shoulder tendon inflammation compensable as direct consequence of workplace fall injury.
kko-precedent_1995_94
Supreme Court dismisses claim that crew member of professional salvage tug is entitled to salvage award share.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

VAKO oli 22.1.1982 antamallaan päätöksellä jättänyt tapaturmavakuutuslain 45 §:n nojalla tutkimatta hakemuksen tapaturmaviraston 21.7.1976 antamalla päätöksellä ratkaistun asian käsittelemisestä sen osalta oliko tapaturman johdosta ensisijaisesti oikeus saada korvausta valtion varoista paloja pelastustoimesta annetun lain vai sairausvakuutuslain nojalla ja hylännyt valituksen tapaturmaviraston samaa korvausta koskevasta päätöksestä. KKO 8.3.1984 kumosi VAKO:n päätöksen. Oikeus korvaukseen paloja pelastustoimesta annetun lain 35 §:n nojalla on ensisijainen verrattuna sairausvakuutuslain 27 §:n 1 mom. perustuvaan korvaukseen.